![]() |
| Spider on the back deck taken with 105 mm Macro lens on Nikon D750 camera |
Earlier this summer Nikon announced the D810 digital SLR as a follow on to their D800. This camera lists for $3300 and is second on the Nikon product line behind the D4S that costs almost twice as much.
![]() |
| Early test picture. 105mm Macro @ ISO 12,800 |
![]() |
| Color Original. 50mm at f5.0 ISO 800 |
![]() |
| High key B&W |
new D100. The other is a 24 mm f2.8 lens that I obtained through a unique set of circumstances that I won't go into but the cost to me for this lens was nothing. So with a relatively wide prime, a normal prime and the full frame capable 105mm macro lens I obtained recently (see my second post in this blog), I decide to go sans-zoom for a while to see how things work out. Besides, the two full frame zoom lenses I have my eyes on to round out my full frame lens collection, the Nikkor 17-35 and the Nikkor 24-70, are both quite expensive and my credit card needs to cool a bit after getting the camera itself.
![]() |
| Taken in NY City Nov 26, 2003. 50mm 1/80 sec @ f5.0 ISO 400 Nikon D100 |
So onto this week's pictures that were (mostly) taken with my new Nikon D750 and a prime lens of one sort or another. Each picture is captioned with the lens used. One of the promises of a newer camera (I've had the D300 since January 2008) is the advances in technology and one such advancement is in the ability to shoot at high ISO with less noise. The D750 boasts an in camera ISO upper end of 12,800 and will allow you to set it for two stops above this for an effective ISO of 51,200. So once I charged the battery and put it into the camera and attached the 50mm f1.8 lens to it I took a couple shots of a medallion I had on my desk. I quickly learned that I could not get as close as I wanted to with the 50 mm so I put on the 105 mm macro and took the shot here at ISO 12,800.
On Friday night I drove to Hamlin Beach state park to try and shoot some star pictures with the 24 mm lens. I arrived at the park shortly after sunset and while I waited for it to get dark I took some shots of these trees growing on a short peninsula. For some reason I can't explain I thought they might look good as a B&W conversion. I settled on a high key conversion that I think looks pretty neat but in second thought I think the color original is more compelling. What do you think?
![]() |
| Big Dipper over lake Ontario. 24mm 8 sec, f2.8 ISO 200 |
![]() |
| 24mm @f5.0 ISO 100 |
In the afternoon, while cooking some chicken in the smoker for dinner, I decided to try and get a good picture of this spider we've been watching for almost 2 weeks. I ended up moving some stuff around on the deck so that I could get to the other side of his (or is it her?) web in order to get the top side of the spider and, more importantly, get the green of the trees as background instead of our grey house. The results were pretty decent (and a bit scary) and is this week's featured picture.
Links to discussions on prime lenses vs zoom lenses
http://digital-photography-school.com/prime-vs-zoom-lenses-which-are-best/
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/fixed-lenses-take-better-pictures.htm
http://photographylife.com/prime-vs-zoom-lenses
http://www.colesclassroom.com/prime-vs-zoom-lenses-top-7-reasons-to-use-primes/





























